http://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=95SvbM8AAAAJ
1.
Solis, Daniel; Borges, Daiane D.; Woellner, Cristiano F.; Galvao, Douglas S.
Structural and Thermal Stability of Graphyne and Graphdiyne Nanoscroll Structures Online
2018, visited: 02.03.2018, (preprint ArXiv: 1803.00154).
@online{Solis2018b,
title = {Structural and Thermal Stability of Graphyne and Graphdiyne Nanoscroll Structures},
author = {Daniel Solis and Daiane D. Borges and Cristiano F. Woellner and Douglas S. Galvao},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.00154},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-03-02},
urldate = {2018-03-02},
abstract = {Graphynes and graphdiynes are generic names for families of two-dimensional carbon allotropes,
where acetylenic groups connect benzenoid-like hexagonal rings, with the co-existence of sp and
sp
2 hybridized carbon atoms. The main differences between graphynes and graphdiynes are the
number of acetylenic groups (one and two for graphynes and graphdiynes, respectively).
Similarly to graphene nanoscrolls, graphyne and graphdiynes nanoscrolls are nanosized
membranes rolled up into papyrus-like structures. In this work we investigated through fully
atomistic reactive molecular dynamics simulations the structural and thermal (up to 1000K)
stability of α,β,γ-graphyne and α,β,γ-graphdiyne scrolls. Our results show that stable nanoscrolls
can be formed for all the structures investigated here, although they are less stable than
corresponding graphene scrolls. This can be explained as a consequence of the higher
graphyne/graphdiyne structural porosity in relation to graphene, which results in decreased π-π
stacking interactions. },
note = {preprint ArXiv: 1803.00154},
keywords = {},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Graphynes and graphdiynes are generic names for families of two-dimensional carbon allotropes,
where acetylenic groups connect benzenoid-like hexagonal rings, with the co-existence of sp and
sp
2 hybridized carbon atoms. The main differences between graphynes and graphdiynes are the
number of acetylenic groups (one and two for graphynes and graphdiynes, respectively).
Similarly to graphene nanoscrolls, graphyne and graphdiynes nanoscrolls are nanosized
membranes rolled up into papyrus-like structures. In this work we investigated through fully
atomistic reactive molecular dynamics simulations the structural and thermal (up to 1000K)
stability of α,β,γ-graphyne and α,β,γ-graphdiyne scrolls. Our results show that stable nanoscrolls
can be formed for all the structures investigated here, although they are less stable than
corresponding graphene scrolls. This can be explained as a consequence of the higher
graphyne/graphdiyne structural porosity in relation to graphene, which results in decreased π-π
stacking interactions.
where acetylenic groups connect benzenoid-like hexagonal rings, with the co-existence of sp and
sp
2 hybridized carbon atoms. The main differences between graphynes and graphdiynes are the
number of acetylenic groups (one and two for graphynes and graphdiynes, respectively).
Similarly to graphene nanoscrolls, graphyne and graphdiynes nanoscrolls are nanosized
membranes rolled up into papyrus-like structures. In this work we investigated through fully
atomistic reactive molecular dynamics simulations the structural and thermal (up to 1000K)
stability of α,β,γ-graphyne and α,β,γ-graphdiyne scrolls. Our results show that stable nanoscrolls
can be formed for all the structures investigated here, although they are less stable than
corresponding graphene scrolls. This can be explained as a consequence of the higher
graphyne/graphdiyne structural porosity in relation to graphene, which results in decreased π-π
stacking interactions.
2018
1.
Solis, Daniel; Borges, Daiane D.; Woellner, Cristiano F.; Galvao, Douglas S.
Structural and Thermal Stability of Graphyne and Graphdiyne Nanoscroll Structures Online
2018, visited: 02.03.2018, (preprint ArXiv: 1803.00154).
Resumo | Links | BibTeX | Tags: graphdiynes, Graphynes, molcular dynamics, Scrolls
@online{Solis2018b,
title = {Structural and Thermal Stability of Graphyne and Graphdiyne Nanoscroll Structures},
author = {Daniel Solis and Daiane D. Borges and Cristiano F. Woellner and Douglas S. Galvao},
url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.00154},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-03-02},
urldate = {2018-03-02},
abstract = {Graphynes and graphdiynes are generic names for families of two-dimensional carbon allotropes,
where acetylenic groups connect benzenoid-like hexagonal rings, with the co-existence of sp and
sp
2 hybridized carbon atoms. The main differences between graphynes and graphdiynes are the
number of acetylenic groups (one and two for graphynes and graphdiynes, respectively).
Similarly to graphene nanoscrolls, graphyne and graphdiynes nanoscrolls are nanosized
membranes rolled up into papyrus-like structures. In this work we investigated through fully
atomistic reactive molecular dynamics simulations the structural and thermal (up to 1000K)
stability of α,β,γ-graphyne and α,β,γ-graphdiyne scrolls. Our results show that stable nanoscrolls
can be formed for all the structures investigated here, although they are less stable than
corresponding graphene scrolls. This can be explained as a consequence of the higher
graphyne/graphdiyne structural porosity in relation to graphene, which results in decreased π-π
stacking interactions. },
note = {preprint ArXiv: 1803.00154},
keywords = {graphdiynes, Graphynes, molcular dynamics, Scrolls},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}
Graphynes and graphdiynes are generic names for families of two-dimensional carbon allotropes,
where acetylenic groups connect benzenoid-like hexagonal rings, with the co-existence of sp and
sp
2 hybridized carbon atoms. The main differences between graphynes and graphdiynes are the
number of acetylenic groups (one and two for graphynes and graphdiynes, respectively).
Similarly to graphene nanoscrolls, graphyne and graphdiynes nanoscrolls are nanosized
membranes rolled up into papyrus-like structures. In this work we investigated through fully
atomistic reactive molecular dynamics simulations the structural and thermal (up to 1000K)
stability of α,β,γ-graphyne and α,β,γ-graphdiyne scrolls. Our results show that stable nanoscrolls
can be formed for all the structures investigated here, although they are less stable than
corresponding graphene scrolls. This can be explained as a consequence of the higher
graphyne/graphdiyne structural porosity in relation to graphene, which results in decreased π-π
stacking interactions.
where acetylenic groups connect benzenoid-like hexagonal rings, with the co-existence of sp and
sp
2 hybridized carbon atoms. The main differences between graphynes and graphdiynes are the
number of acetylenic groups (one and two for graphynes and graphdiynes, respectively).
Similarly to graphene nanoscrolls, graphyne and graphdiynes nanoscrolls are nanosized
membranes rolled up into papyrus-like structures. In this work we investigated through fully
atomistic reactive molecular dynamics simulations the structural and thermal (up to 1000K)
stability of α,β,γ-graphyne and α,β,γ-graphdiyne scrolls. Our results show that stable nanoscrolls
can be formed for all the structures investigated here, although they are less stable than
corresponding graphene scrolls. This can be explained as a consequence of the higher
graphyne/graphdiyne structural porosity in relation to graphene, which results in decreased π-π
stacking interactions.
